> With all the hype and euphoria over ChatGPT, all we get is a site which is asking you to paste in code you probably copied internally from work or StackOverf

> With all the hype and euphoria over ChatGPT, all we get is a site which is asking you to paste in code you probably copied internally from work or StackOverflow to give an opaque explanation about what is wrong with it. I can see how that might be useless to you and to quite a few others but we have many distributed down the learning curve. Someone who can deliver a better explanation might be expensive and their time shouldn't be wasted on questions the model can answer reasonably. > Even most of the time, it generates broken code as you attempt to use more sophisticated language features (especially Rust) and confidently generates code that doesn't compile or is flat out incorrect. I think you are throwing out the circuit board with the bath water. Go hook up a compiler to it? Patches are welcome? > I guess you're spending more time reviewing the broken AI code more than actually writing the code itself. This seems to me a task that, unlike writing code, many people could do in parallel. You could even measure peoples performance by counting the issues they didn't find. > On top of that, no-one here would be comfortable to paste in code that is internal to their work on a random website either. Perhaps, I cant talk for others, but much of my stuff is done on the front end.