4 ms·

If you're not going to try to engage in reasonable discussions I'm not going to continue to respond. The first event is ancient history and started with a publ

If you're not going to try to engage in reasonable discussions I'm not going to continue to respond. The first event is ancient history and started with a public personal attack by said individual against Musk, and the second Musk apologized for as he was misinformed by others. > So what you're saying is he bullshits and he lies. No that's not what I said. Please follow hacker news guidelines. > Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

clouddrover 4y ago
> I'm not going to continue to respond. And yet you have. > The first event is ancient history and started with a public personal attack by said individual against Musk It's the reputation Musk has earnt for himself. He wanted it. He sought it out. He has it. > and the second Musk apologized for as he was misinformed by others Sure, sure. It's always someone else's fault. > No that's not what I said That's exactly what you said. Musk will never act in good faith or with honesty. But I expect better from you.