4 ms·
Lol I had the same thought reading that headline. I wonder if the author even realizes that not all generative AI is ChatGPT (probably not because the bar for '
by wildrhythms 4y ago
Lol I had the same thought reading that headline. I wonder if the author even realizes that not all generative AI is ChatGPT (probably not because the bar for 'tech journalist' seems to be quite low).
- rhaway84773 4y agoThe author pretty clearly knows that not all generative AI is ChatGPT if you read even the first line of the article. However, the vast non tech readership wouldn’t know what generative AI is, but nearly everyone and their mother knows what ChatGPT is. So the headline is extremely effective in conveying what Google’s demo does while being understandable by the largest possible audience. It’s an extremely valid and appropriate headline.
- gkoberger 4y agoI bet the person who wrote the article and the person who wrote the title are two different people. Both did the jobs they’re supposed to be doing. The article writer knew what they were talking about, and the headline writer knew how to get clicks.
- sp332 4y agoThat's true a lot of places, but Ars writers actually write their own headlines. In fact they're required to write two, and the CMS will A/B test them for an hour before picking a winner. You can tell which one is the "A hed" because it's in the URL. This one is the A hed, so the author probably preferred this over the other one. (Not sure what it was.)