How in the world is this discriminatory compensation? Let's simplify and say that: everyone at the company, and their families, are entitled to 100% of monthly

How in the world is this discriminatory compensation? Let's simplify and say that: everyone at the company, and their families, are entitled to 100% of monthly premiums covered. Someone choosing not to use that benefit as much as someone else by having fewer dependents is not discrimination. It's like saying "I don't have a gym membership, I'm not using the wellness benefit each month, this is discrimination and others are getting paid more than me!"