Well brython is already quite fast already, so I don't think a WASM version would be worse. What are you basing this on? Brython's own web page says simple ope

Well brython is already quite fast already, so I don't think a WASM version would be worse. What are you basing this on? Brython's own web page says simple operations are slower than regular python and regular python is going to run at about 1/60th the speed of webasm. Even python users seems to recommend not using it. https://old.reddit.com/r/Python/comments/3z54u1/is_it_really_feasible_to_use_brython_to_replace/cyjtpyf/ https://old.reddit.com/r/Python/comments/3z54u1/is_it_really... Python performance has already improved a bit, and performance is rarely a real problem in software anyway. Again, I think this is for users to decide if performance isn't a problem. Most big and popular websites are sluggish even on powerful desktops, let alone a phone that's a few years old. When someone talks about using super slow languages for something interactive and distributed to users, that's a pretty big red flag, even more when they say 'performance is rarely a problem'.