3 ms·
>It's not unusual for Olympic marathon runners to have higher body fat percentages than their sprinter compatriots. It's not only unusual, it's unheard of! El
by xiaoma 15y ago
>It's not unusual for Olympic marathon runners to have higher body fat percentages than their sprinter compatriots.
It's not only unusual, it's unheard of! Elite marathoners have far lower levels of body fat than other athletes, with men clocking in at around 3%! Even unusually lean sprinters have about double that.
See the chart in this journal for a variety of athletes including marathoners compared (should be free for a few page views), p.764
http://books.google.co.kr/books?id=XOyjZX0Wxw4C&pg=PA764 http://books.google.co.kr/books?id=XOyjZX0Wxw4C&pg=PA764
- jacques_chester 15y agoYou're right (I should have double-checked). I've been repeating bro-science. If you'll excuse me, I'll be jogging around the block for penance.
- xiaoma 15y agoHaha, that made me smile! :) I think the main reason for the misconception is that lots of people compete in marathon races and some of them are fat. So people see someone who can still run a marathon but is still fat and think, "ha they can run for hours but they're still chubby!" But nobody really competes in a 100-400m race after school age unless they're elite or semi-elite... and obviously those guys are lean sprinting machines. That's the only kind of person we ever see sprinting. Compared to that zany uncle who decided to start marathoning upon reaching midlife, elite sprinters on TV are manimals! If we reversed it though, and compared everyone fit enough to complete a 400m race, at any level with elite marathoners, the results would be the opposite. We'd be saying wow... those skinny marathoners can run 400m faster than most racers, and then do it again 104 more times without rest! Woah!!!