2 ms·
Violate this reasoning: If we didn't have a use case for GPT 3, 3.5, and chatGPT that was sufficiently commercial to become a product, it will never happen. Th
by anonymouse008 4y ago
Violate this reasoning:
If we didn't have a use case for GPT 3, 3.5, and chatGPT that was sufficiently commercial to become a product, it will never happen. This technology is a feature, not a product. The only companies that successfully monetize features can be considered IP licensing houses; of which, their business success is not comparable to companies that make products and platforms.