3 ms·
Then why submit it to a professional human at all? If ChatGPT is prone to massive errors humans have to pour over the input anyway. If ChatGPT can make subtle,
by paulryanrogers 4y ago
Then why submit it to a professional human at all? If ChatGPT is prone to massive errors humans have to pour over the input anyway. If ChatGPT can make subtle, rare errors then again humans may need to be involved if the stakes are high enough to commission someone.
- msikora 4y agoAs a second opinion advisory role this seems reasonable... And also things are going to improve with time.
- glenstein 4y ago>If ChatGPT can make subtle, rare errors Yeah, I think the issues presented will relate to uniquely tricky errors, or entirely new categories of errors we have to understand the nature of. In addition to subtle and rare, I think elaborately hallucinated and justified errors, errors that become justified and reasoned for with increasing sophistication, is going to be a category of error we'll have to deal with. Consider the case of making fake but very plausible sounding citations to research papers, and how much further AI might be able to go to backfill in it's evidence and reasons. Anyway, I just mean to suggest we will have to contend with a few new genres of errors