4 ms·
Will any of the profits be shared with original authors whose work powers the model?
by anileated 4y ago
Will any of the profits be shared with original authors whose work powers the model?
- James_Henry 4y agoWhich authors? Machine Learning research authors?
- anileated 4y agoI mean the authors who wrote the works which are resold by Microsoft for its own profit without any opt-in or even opt-out, much less compensation.
- cma 4y agoIt doesn't seem to be answered in the article, but if it was and you read it should you have to pay them a fee for the knowledge if it was published openly on the net?
- anileated 4y agoYou are confusing two distinct cases. In the first case, you found/bought a book and read it. No one can or should make you pay for it, unless you stole the book. In the second case, you found/bought a book then reprinted it infinitely and sold it for profit, ethically you should pay the author and legally you should be in violation of the law. Even if you made a machine that ingests and recombines books automatically, and you keep that machine locked up and charge people for its use, it is the same scenario: the machine would be absolutely useless without the original books, those books cost people effort and money to produce, yet you pay those people nothing while the machine is basically an infinite money maker for you. I hope the analogy makes sense.
- sebzim4500 4y agoNo. Now that you have read my answer, you owe me $0.01 because your brain might use this information in the future.
- anileated 4y agoSo are you in favour of granting human rights to a machine? If not, your analogy makes zero sense because we are talking about a copyright laundering tool creating derivative works, not a thinking human that presumably we both are.
- djvdq 4y agoPeople's outrage to your valid question is ridiculous. MS and OpenAI will make billions because they scrapped lots and lots of data, but aurhors od those data can't get anything because openai simps will shout. I see this is very american thing to do. Allow corporations to do everything they want, because limitations or just justice and rewarding real authors of data those corporations benefit from is literally communism
- pixl97 4y agoBecause at the other end of this equation you would have companies like disney holding you at gunpoint for money if you ever spoke about mice.
- djvdq 4y agoOh yeah, because there can be only extremities. Sure.
- drexlspivey 4y agoOk profits will be shared with all internet users. Send an invoice for $0.0000000000001 for your contributions to the internet corpus.
- PokemonNoGo 4y agoMade my first million this year myself actually and I probably have many people to credit that I forgot to credit. I can start with Pythagoras, Galileo [insert everyone between], Kernighan, Ritchie. Also the guy who invented pencilin. I'm honestly not sure how these angles arise. Knowledge wants to be free. We are here today because of this fact. When it comes to spam culture sure. But will we ever be there? "AI art" isn't impressive and will never be. It is impressive in the academic sense. Nothing more.
- malborodog 4y agoHow’d you make a million dollars in a year dude?
- 4y ago
- PokemonNoGo 4y agoIsaac Newton has sadly passed.
- anileated 4y agoYes, dead people are fine not being paid, so what’s your plan then I fear to ask?
- wetpaws 4y agoThe model is powered by math.