6 ms·
I really don't understand the move. No way open source collectives will be able to pay the 300$/y minimum cost for an organisation and there is no way to conver
by Sytten 4y ago
I really don't understand the move. No way open source collectives will be able to pay the 300$/y minimum cost for an organisation and there is no way to convert an organisation back to a user. I expect there will be a lot of broken pulling of images on that day.
- Helmut10001 4y agoGitlab registry is maybe the easiest way out of this, either payed or self-hosted using the community version.
- nicce 4y agoGitHub container registry has no limitations for public projects, unlike GitLab.
- noptd 4y agoNo limitations for now.
- folkrav 4y agoThat could be said of any free container registry out there...
- troyvit 4y agoExactly. Software development is in the middle of a clash with reality. It's just not sensible to expect to pay nothing for a piece of vital infrastructure.
- bongobingo1 4y ago100% agreed. Donate to cURL!
- tedivm 4y agoI've been publishing all of my open source containers on GHCR for this exact reason. https://github.com/multi-py/ https://github.com/multi-py/
- josegonzalez 4y agoI thought there were size limits for the entire account?
- nicce 4y ago> GitHub Packages usage is free for public packages. https://docs.github.com/en/billing/managing-billing-for-github-packages/about-billing-for-github-packages https://docs.github.com/en/billing/managing-billing-for-gith...
- HdS84 4y agoGitlab registry is utterly annoying with it's confusing namespacing. Would use github oder anything else tbh.
- toastal 4y agoCachix is adding a free tier for FOSS projects. Drop Docker; move to Nix.
- yjftsjthsd-h 4y agoUnless they're exposing oci images, that solves a completely different problem (Don't get me wrong, I like nix, but it's nothing like a drop in replacement for a container-based workflow)