4 ms·
The spectral properties of the noise does matter a bit (see the stable diffusion offset noise issue for example) but > These variations in the coarseness of no
by Jack000 4y ago
The spectral properties of the noise does matter a bit (see the stable diffusion offset noise issue for example) but
> These variations in the coarseness of noise pattern will each obscure patterns of the same coarseness.
is not accurate. During the forward noise process the high frequency information is obscured first, and the coarse information last. During the reverse process, the neural net learns to denoise the coarse visual elements first, and adds high frequency details at the end. With the original clip guided diffusion notebook you can skip the last 10% of the denoising steps to get a smoother image.
This is also the root cause of the noise offset problem (the coarse information is not completely obscured by the forward process)
- IIAOPSW 4y agoYou're making exactly the same point I am making. I was just substituting the word "coarseness" for "frequency" in an attempt to make it more accessible for people who have never studied this topic. I'm glad someone else sees the frequency space folly of the diffusion process. If I had time, I would test the hypothesis of doing all the learning in frequency space rather than trying to shape the profile of the noise. But I don't have time so feel free to steal my idea.