> We are a technology company, and our ultimate output is what we build for people. Everything else we do is in service of that. As we’ve grown, we’ve hired man

> We are a technology company, and our ultimate output is what we build for people. Everything else we do is in service of that. As we’ve grown, we’ve hired many leading experts in areas outside engineering. This helps us build better products, but with many new teams it takes intentional focus to make sure our company remains primarily technologists. As we add different groups, our product teams naturally hire more roles to handle all the interactions with those other groups. If we only rebalanced the product teams towards engineering, those leaner product teams would be overwhelmed by the volume of interactions from other groups. As part of the Year of Efficiency, we’re focusing on returning to a more optimal ratio of engineers to other roles. It’s important for all groups to get leaner and more efficient to enable our technology groups to get as lean and efficient as possible. We will make sure we continue to meet all our critical and legal obligations as we find ways to operate more efficiently. How should this be interpreted? They're getting rid of all the Agile Coaches?