> It does not follow from the GP comment's claim that the author must be writing for HN readers. It seemed clear to me that the comment was a snide remark sugg

> It does not follow from the GP comment's claim that the author must be writing for HN readers. It seemed clear to me that the comment was a snide remark suggesting that the article was clickbait. Much like some of the other snide remarks on this submission, such as the sibling comment "The difference is that this article is an advertisement for the app they're selling." https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35149157 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35149157