3 ms·
> In 100yrs or even 1000yrs, do you think people, if they still exist, will look back and say "wow we're amazed at the hard work of those men and women who dril
by throwawaylinux 4y ago
> In 100yrs or even 1000yrs, do you think people, if they still exist, will look back and say "wow we're amazed at the hard work of those men and women who drilled the last hydrocarbons"?
Sure. I am amazed at the hard work of the men who cut timber and cut road and railway track through mountains and mined and hunted whales and trapped animals hundreds of years ago despite that they irrevocably destroyed ecosystems.
> Chances are they will have a lot of really mean things to say instead about our reticence, and how little intact ecology we left them to work with.
I'd say the chances are the situation would be quite recognizable, with most people wishing things were better but unwilling to sacrifice much of their own, and the most comfortable and well off who benefit most from and have the largest environmental footprints denouncing others and shifting blame, so some thought will be spared for the whalers of today, but not a great deal.
- swexbe 4y agoYou can say this because their environmental destruction wasn't enough for you personally to be worse of than them. If that's the case for future generations, they will almost certainly be angry.
- throwawaylinux 4y agoNo you're wrong, even if I was angry at them I would still be amazed by the work they did.
- listenallyall 4y agoBeing angry doesn't necessarily equate to being right or rational. A lot of people are really pissed off about climate change and ecological harm and blame previous generations for drilling, mining, polluting, etc... then they happily board a plane to some exotic locale to get a few good shots to post to Instagram.