> Adding new sensors adds new errors which leaves you to chose between ignoring danger conditions present in only one sensor as possible errors or greatly incre

> Adding new sensors adds new errors which leaves you to chose between ignoring danger conditions present in only one sensor as possible errors or greatly increasing safety stops etc No, sorry that cannot be left as is.. I see your arguments but they are pulled of thin air, or is there any source that reasoning actually happened there. If fusion done right, this will never increase but decrease errors. > they would fail from a user experience point of view at the first false stop during a demo to the big man and then be forever poisoned (imho). And failing on the first situation that a second sensor set would have clearly prevented can easily be argued the same.. this is a strawman.