3 ms·
> Thing is, I really doubt a 10k system would offer something really relevant above this. The problem with testing Hifi using Metal is that only the recording
by grumpyprole 4y ago
> Thing is, I really doubt a 10k system would offer something really relevant above this.
The problem with testing Hifi using Metal is that only the recording engineer really knows what it originally sounded like. Metal recordings are also generally very compressed and so not a good test of dynamics and transients. A good test of a Hifi would involve acoustic instruments, violins, cellos, pianos, orchestras etc. You also need very well recorded source material.
- stef25 4y ago> really knows what it originally sounded like Is matching the original recorded sound really the purpose of a good hifi system ? From what I understand, studio monitors as used in production / mastering have this goal (to sound "neutral"). Hifi speakers are supposed to add their own character to the recorded sound, no? When talking about acoustic instruments, doesn't each one sound different? Like you could buy two violins from the same manufacturer and they wouldn't have the same exact sound, esp as the years go by. Same goes for analog synths & drum machines, and that's the good thing about them, the fact that they develop their own character.
- grumpyprole 4y ago> Is matching the original recorded sound really the purpose of a good hifi system ? Yes, at least it used to. Hifi means High Fidelity, which means a high degree of exactness in reproducing the music, as the artists and recording engineers intended. > Hifi speakers are supposed to add their own character to the recorded sound, no? I would argue they should not. But consumer "Hifi" certainly does often colour the sound. This is why many audiophiles had to seek out "studio" monitors and earphones. However, even this term has lost its meaning. You will not find "Beats Studio" earphones in any studio. > When talking about acoustic instruments, doesn't each one sound different? Maybe slightly yes, but only in certain ways. A bad audio system might make them sound unnatural. Pianos and violins certainly have much less variation than electric guitars.
- aforwardslash 4y agoIm not testing, Im listening. Sure there are degrees of creativity involved in mastering & mixing, but oddly enough, more often than not I've actually seen them live. And your definition of metal is amusing - id suggest you Ne Obliviscaris, Fleshgod Apocalypse within the segment I mentioned or Dream Theater, Haggard or Epica as multi-instrumental, operatic recordings.
- grumpyprole 4y ago> And your definition of metal is amusing I did not attempt to define Metal. I only tried to point out that it is often heavily compressed, as is pop music, see for example: https://www.theguardian.com/music/2008/sep/17/metallica.guitar.hero.loudness.war https://www.theguardian.com/music/2008/sep/17/metallica.guit... I certainly find the idea of playing this stuff on a 10K Hifi amusing, which was perhaps your original point? EDIT: You can check your favourite albums, by using this resource: https://dr.loudness-war.info/album/list/1/dr/asc?artist=Epica https://dr.loudness-war.info/album/list/1/dr/asc?artist=Epic... Compare with e.g. some classical music recordings: https://dr.loudness-war.info/?artist=Berliner%20Philharmoniker,%20Claudio%20Abbado https://dr.loudness-war.info/?artist=Berliner%20Philharmonik...