3 ms·
> this worked for a little bit longer, but he proceeded to get on a VPN, and then another when i blocked that IP, then another when i blocked that IP, etc, etc.
by mcstempel 4y ago
> this worked for a little bit longer, but he proceeded to get on a VPN, and then another when i blocked that IP, then another when i blocked that IP, etc, etc.
Beyond VPNs, I've even seen attackers leverage residential IP networks which makes VPN detection ineffective as well [1]. If you ever need a more permanent identifier to ban users on, consider using a device/browser fingerprinting tool [2]. It helps avoid the whack-a-mole issue of more sophisticated attackers churning IPs/emails/user agents/etc.
[1] https://brightdata.com/proxy-types/residential-proxies https://brightdata.com/proxy-types/residential-proxies
[2] https://stytch.com/products/device-fingerprinting https://stytch.com/products/device-fingerprinting (I'm admittedly biased towards our solution as I work at Stytch)
- alam2000 4y ago[dead]
- eks391 4y agoAlthough difficult and not well known about, fingerprinting can be randomized[1]. I have been successful creating a random fingerprint on only Brave so far, but I did need to tweak some browser settings. 1 check your fingerprint details here: https://coveryourtracks.eff.org/ https://coveryourtracks.eff.org/