4 ms·
> One SVB depositor, the streaming service Roku, has $487 billion housed in the bank—only a small fraction of which seems to be insured. Not impressed by the b
by feross 4y ago
> One SVB depositor, the streaming service Roku, has $487 billion housed in the bank—only a small fraction of which seems to be insured.
Not impressed by the basic factual errors in this article. $487 billion ≠ $487 million. https://variety.com/2023/digital/news/roku-svb-failed-silicon-valley-bank-cash-1235549817/ https://variety.com/2023/digital/news/roku-svb-failed-silico...
EDIT: I just noticed another disappointing factual error, bordering on disinformation. They say:
> On October 14, 2022, Sacks tweeted, “The idea that the American government, the American taxpayer, or any American company is obligated to provide support is pre entitlement.” That was before the SVB collapse. On March 10, 2023, Sacks sang a different tune: “Where is Powell? Where is Yellen? Stop the crisis NOW. Announce that all depositors will be safe.”
I'm no Sacks apologist, but they took his first quote completely out-of-context, making it sound like he was saying the US government shouldn't support failing companies, when he was in fact talking about the US supporting Ukraine. See: https://twitter.com/DavidSacks/status/1634357137873969152 https://twitter.com/DavidSacks/status/1634357137873969152
- Apocryphon 4y agoI think it's just typos. The third paragraph alone has the misspelling "SBV’s"
- feross 4y ago[flagged]
- conorcleary 4y agoThey're using their new automated writing tools without proofreading.
- blooalien 4y agoI had this exact thought just as I happen to scroll upon your comment…
- gr1zzlybe4r 4y agoThat's funny - I've noticed a lack of basic knowledge of fractional reserve banking and the FDIC in the tech crowd.
- sourcecodeplz 4y agoDon't believe everything you read on the internets... Edit: we're currently at 1200feet going 30 000 miles per hour.
- renewiltord 4y agoI hope they got their $487 trillion back.
- pessimizer 4y agoThe first is trivial, but the second is horrific. That's like citing someone tweeting about bailing out their leaky rowboat as "support for bailouts."