> Then why the long rambling on the moral outcome? The moral outcome the author is promoting isn't about anti-collusion, but diversity: "The need for diversity

> Then why the long rambling on the moral outcome? The moral outcome the author is promoting isn't about anti-collusion, but diversity: "The need for diversity in education is as vital today as ever. But it’s not clear whether the Ivy Agreement’s ban on athletic scholarships actually promotes that end. One might even wonder whether, by not competing over sports stars, the schools are reducing the diversity of their student bodies." Except, the author admits later that athletic programs simply promote more athletics and the claims of diversity through athletics is dubious.