4 ms·
I find it almost impossible to not see them as related. Take a look at [0]. Long-term this could be a good decision, I believe early-stage investing really is d
by doodlesdev 4y ago
I find it almost impossible to not see them as related. Take a look at [0]. Long-term this could be a good decision, I believe early-stage investing really is different to late-stage investment, but of course the moment to make this decision makes it evident there are other factors at play that influence this.
[0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35114009 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35114009
- dang 4y agoThe timing does make that almost impossible! But if you want the actual connected edge in the directed graph I believe it's https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32637686 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32637686.
- doodlesdev 4y agoHmm, that does make sense. The other comment here said that this kind of change is almost impossible to happen is such as short amount of time, which makes sense. Maybe they were already planning for a change in strategy by the new CEO, and this just happened to be an appropriate time to get done with the change already. edit: Oh well the other commenter was the new CEO LOL, not used to reading usernames. I guess that adds a bit of bias but I believe it's a true statement.
- garry 4y agoChanges of this sort cannot happen in a very short amount of time. The timing was coincidental.
- bigbraintheroom 4y agoI have made changes with other C-level employees in under 30m which had more than 30m of impact. Can you explain how that would not be the case here? Not understanding how this timing is “coincidental”, it doesn’t appear to be that way at all.