4 ms·
I thought ChatGPT is only 20B parameters to begin with? (Source https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2023/02/17/is-bigger-better-why-the-chatgpt-vs-g
by SteveDR 4y ago
I thought ChatGPT is only 20B parameters to begin with?
(Source https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2023/02/17/is-bigger-better-why-the-chatgpt-vs-gpt-3-vs-gpt-4-battle-is-just-a-family-chat/amp/ https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2023/02/17/is...)
- sebzim4500 4y agoI haven't seen anything official from OpenAI confirming that ChatGPT has fewer than 175B parameters, although it is a reasonable guess if you read between the lines of their statements. Given the author of that article is a CEO of an 'AI Ad Optimization Platform' I think that number is speculative at best.
- stavros 4y agoChatGPT is fine-tuned InstructGPT, which has 1.3B parameters, if I'm not mistaken. Reference for the former: https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/03/03/1069311/inside-story-oral-history-how-chatgpt-built-openai/ https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/03/03/1069311/inside-s...
- sebzim4500 4y agoInstructGPT isn't a single model, it's a set of techniques for finetuning a foundation model
- est 4y agowhat does "1.3B parameters" mean in this context? Does it mean we load 175B gpt-3 model first, then overwrite 1.3B parameters with InstructGPT? I find this sentence difficult to understand > Our labelers prefer outputs from our 1.3B InstructGPT model over outputs from a 175B GPT-3 model https://openai.com/research/instruction-following https://openai.com/research/instruction-following I am a newbie, plz correct me if I am wrong.
- sebzim4500 4y agoThey mean that they took a 1.3B parameter model, applied the InstructGPT finetuning model and found that it worked better for their usecase than a 175B parameter model which had not gone through that process.
- est 4y agoAh I got it now. Thanks. From the gpt-3 paper it looks like they have many variants like - GPT-3-350M - GPT-3-1.3B - GPT-3-2.7B - GPT-3-6.7B - GPT-3-13B - GPT-3-175B Ada, Babbage, Curie and Davinci line up closely with 350M, 1.3B, 6.7B, and 175B respectively. The names are pretty suggestive.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]