3 ms·
I saw "generate clutter..." in the title and thought "why would I want to generate clutter?" I know it's a minor point but I'd go "Remove clutter, ads and trac
by dmje 4y ago
I saw "generate clutter..." in the title and thought "why would I want to generate clutter?"
I know it's a minor point but I'd go "Remove clutter, ads and trackers from any article" for a stronger initial proposition.
- carapace 4y ago> Generate clutter-, ad-, and tracker-free article pages to share I miss hyphens.
- wunderlust 4y agoThis is correct, and without the hyphens it reads like a garden-path sentence[1], which is one with an ambiguous structure that normal readers tend to parse incorrectly. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garden-path_sentence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garden-path_sentence
- codetrotter 4y ago“Generate removal of clutter, ads and trackers” and then everyone is happy :D
- pcthrowaway 4y ago"Generate a URL that brings the content of any article into focus, leaving the clutter, ads, and tracking behind"
- emmelaich 4y agoMine is > Generate pages free of ads, trackers and other clutter. Put the major purpose in the first two words. [edit - otoh it doesn't generate pages really but generates versions of existing pages]
- layer8 4y agoHow about “Declutter web pages, remove ads and trackers”. Then the thing being improved (web pages) is also mentioned at the start and not only at the end.
- henshao 4y agoTo hop on this tagline train...open to any critiques. "Share any link with ads and tracking removed." Rationale: Sharing = most important verb/subject. Followed by the subject (links) Ads and tracking - people know what ads are, they might know what tracking implies. trackers may be more abstract. Clutter - removed this word. What does clutter mean in this context?
- web0_cc 4y agoMy bad. First of all thank you all for the feedback & suggestions. I think these all are good suggestions. I will pick one for sure
- 1vuio0pswjnm7 4y agoWas also thrown off by the ambiguous grammar. But for me the thought was "Finally, a submitted example of using AI as a means to generate garbage to be consumed by "tech" companies as 'data, the new oil'." Faculty cannot detect the use of "AI". We have much about that. But neither can "tech" companies. As for the submission, unlike archive.is, archive.ph, etc. web0.cc does not require Javascript, it does not require the user to solve a CAPTCHA, it does not insist on EDNS0 (ECS),^1 and it does not connect to the following third party URLs https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api.js?onload=onloadCallback&render=explicit https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api.js?onload=onloadCallbac... https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/ping?sitemap=https://archive.ph/sitemap.xml https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/ping?sitemap=https:/... https://a.publir.com/platform/1100.js https://a.publir.com/platform/1100.js https://a.publir.com/sellers.json https://a.publir.com/sellers.json https://a.publir.com/ads-txt/505/ads.txt https://a.publir.com/ads-txt/505/ads.txt https://top-fwz1.mail.ru/js/code.js https://top-fwz1.mail.ru/js/code.js 1. Including disabling the use of Cloudflare DNS. Even when a user is not using EDNS0, archive.ph still collects the user's IP address using DNS. For example, https://[YOUR_IP_ADDRESS].[YOUR_COUNTRY].inc1.358424231.pixel.archive.ph/x.gif Further, archive.ph does not seem to work with archive.org. Web0.cc seems to work: https://web.archive.org/web/20230313185743if_/https://web0.cc/a/zTHtZFEXci https://web.archive.org/web/20230313185743if_/https://web0.c...
- d00nut 4y agoAgreed. Some example links or a single small before/after image would have helped.