4 ms·
No because after making an interpreter you have a nice language to work with. That makes it very different than BF.
by danssig 15y ago
No because after making an interpreter you have a nice language to work with. That makes it very different than BF.
- haberman 15y agoThat is begging the question. The argument was supposed to prove that Lisp is "awesome;" if you have to assume that Lisp is a "nice language" for the argument to work, the argument hasn't proven anything. I think Ruby is a nicer language than Lisp.
- danssig 15y agoNice is relative. Most anything is nice compared with BF.