3 ms·
Fair enough, but I doubt that adds up to enough that there's a real impact to the spending ability ratio of the two companies. You're paying negative $5 for ca
by AgentConundrum 15y ago
Fair enough, but I doubt that adds up to enough that there's a real impact to the spending ability ratio of the two companies.
You're paying negative $5 for cable, but how many other people are doing that. I don't know the going rate for Comcast cable, so I'll use the $25 basic service fee from Eastlink in Canada (my service) as the exemplar.
Assume there are only two possible monthly payments for Comcast. You can get the basic service for $25 or you can get the "they quit the service but we're keeping them on the books" service for $-5. Given these prices, you would need to have 3.4 subscribers at the latter price for every one subscriber at the former price before Comcast and Netflix would be making equal money off subscriptions alone. I seriously doubt 77% of Comcast subscribers are ghosts like you, so I stand by my argument that Netflix is massively financially outgunned by Comcast.
- chaostheory 15y ago> I seriously doubt 77% of Comcast subscribers are ghosts like you, so I stand by my argument that Netflix is massively financially outgunned by Comcast. I don't disagree but time is not on Comcast's side. Anyone who went to college in the 90s and younger is a huge threat to cable tv.