> even that it's their preference > they'd lose a big part of their experienced workforce and would incur significant additional labor costs as the market adju

> even that it's their preference > they'd lose a big part of their experienced workforce and would incur significant additional labor costs as the market adjusted to the change The second statement clearly disproves the first one. Tyson could get Americans (TM) if they paid significantly more and moved them in to rural areas; but it’s much easier to employ cheap immigrants and act dumb. Disclaimer: No judgement passed on immigrants, only on capitalism and stupid politicians.