2 ms·
Does this REPL support all of the features that traditional, batch-processed Rust does? Last time I checked, I found "REPLs" for Rust that were hacks, just putt
by throw10920 4y ago
Does this REPL support all of the features that traditional, batch-processed Rust does? Last time I checked, I found "REPLs" for Rust that were hacks, just putting code into a file and re-compiling and re-running the whole thing - didn't support all of the features and super slow.
> incremental compile time is often very fast
I tried Rust a few years ago and got incremental compile times in the tens of seconds for medium-sized projects, which is excruciatingly slow. Unless compile times are sub-second, it's not fast enough, unless the REPL is somehow faster.