> He did not use the word 'Nazi' at all, he compared the language used to the language of 1930s Germany This is a distinction without a difference, as you well

> He did not use the word 'Nazi' at all, he compared the language used to the language of 1930s Germany This is a distinction without a difference, as you well know. > a comparison which is justified. And yet you're unable to actually make such an argument. The argument, of course, isn't the point. The point is associating your political opponents with Nazis. > The asylum "issue" is being exaggerated by right-wing media to distract from the many bigger problems that have either been caused by or exacerbated by the Tories mis-management of the UK. The Tories were elected in large part to address immigration issues, remember? Who convinced you that enacting their platform is somehow nefarious? > Personally, I think that refugees need to be shown some empathy and kindness. The ones who are safe and sound in France or Germany, who're affected by this new law? Why do they need your empathy when they're in a safe third country? Is this refusal of empathy sufficient to brand someone a Nazi?