3 ms·
> If not, why not? Both banks would have the same assets. Unlike NFTs or whatever, the bonds held to maturity will pay out the full amount.
by unmole 4y ago
> If not, why not? Both banks would have the same assets.
Unlike NFTs or whatever, the bonds held to maturity will pay out the full amount.
- kgwgk 4y agoThe second bank has just bought - because it has enough money to do so selling its NFT or whatever - the same bonds that SVB has. There is no difference at all between the assets of liabilities and the two banks in this example. I don’t mean just that the amounts are the same: every asset is identical. Can both use the “I have the money but just not right now” excuse or not?
- unmole 4y ago> every asset is identical. You lost me there. > Can both use the “I have the money but just not right now” excuse or not? No.
- kgwgk 4y agoBank 1 starts with $1000 in t-bills and $1000 in t-bonds (face value $1000) The bonds lose 20% (for simplicity the t-bills gain 0%) Bank 1 ends with $1000 in t-bills and $800 in t-bonds (face value $1000) According to some people Bank 1 can say “I have $2000 it’s just that I don’t have them right now” Bank 2 starts with $1800 in t-bills and $200 in NFTs In the same period the NFTs lose 100% Bank 2 still has $1800 in t-bills, sells $800 and buys $800 of those t-bonds which are trading at a 20% discount to par Bank 2 ends with $1000 in t-bills and $800 in t-bonds (face value $1000) Bank 1 and Bank 2 are in the same exact situation Bank 1 can say “I have $2000 it’s just that I don’t have them right now” but Bank 2 cannot do the same?
- dtech 4y agoSay the 1% 10y $100 bond is now worth $80 and there are now 5% bonds available. Say the monkey NFT is down from $100 to $80. The monkey NFT could be sold and 5% bonds could be bought, which will also pay out >$100 eventually.