You’re linking an article from 2002 that was controversial even at the time. You can see coverage from 2002 in the Washington Post, for example: https://www.was

You’re linking an article from 2002 that was controversial even at the time. You can see coverage from 2002 in the Washington Post, for example: https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/opinions/2002/06/29/pedophilia-and-homosexuality/b385cfb3-8b58-449d-8af9-0cfdcd278978/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/opinions/2002/06/29/p... The author of the article, Timothy Dailey, is associated with the Family Research Council, which still in 2023 has this on its website: https://www.frc.org/homosexuality https://www.frc.org/homosexuality Now, why do you need to go back to an obscure article published over 20 years ago by a homophobic ultraconservative organization to source your claims? Perhaps because the vast majority of experts now believe these claims to be false.