4 ms·
That scheme would be far less reliable. For one, if you corrupt a file and don't notice right away, you lose it forever (which sort of defeats the purpose of ba
by oconnore 15y ago
That scheme would be far less reliable. For one, if you corrupt a file and don't notice right away, you lose it forever (which sort of defeats the purpose of backups, doesn't it?).
Also, you wouldn't actually do a full backup every day. You would perform data journaling with periodic snapshots. For example, with daily backups with a change rate of 5%, and monthly snapshots, you need only 2.5x your data size per month ignoring the minimal transaction overhead.