4 ms·
I completely agree with this world without men for women. I also advocate a world without women for men. Not sure about South Korea, but in the USA, there's n
by FrontierPsych 4y ago
I completely agree with this world without men for women.
I also advocate a world without women for men.
Not sure about South Korea, but in the USA, there's no benefit for a man to marry a woman, either. I've long advocated for men not to get married. The number of friends I've had go to absolute poverty because of a divorce is incredible. Living in their cars, lose their kids except for 4 days a month (every other weekend).
But in the world without men, they women should probably move to an uninhabited land and start their own cities, put in pipelines, sewers, open auto repair shops, start construction companies, create and pave roads, build homes and highrise buildings, electricians - all that stuff that men traditionally do for women. Only 2-4% of all construction tradespeople are women in the USA, not counting women in admin or management - only counting the actual trades workers. If women are going to do this, they shouldn't depend on the infrastructure that men created, and should be 100% in their world without men. Seems fair to me. If women are going to live without men, then commit to it. And the same with men. Men will have to do without having 284 pillows on their bed, hearing about how their friend's brother's sister's boyfriend's boss' mother re-decorated their house. It's a steep price, but I think men can do make it without women. And women without men. For one generation, anyways. Then if we do it worldwide, the Earth can do a reset and go back to where it was before humans messed it up. So it all works out perfectly. Put a bow on it.
However, I've read artificial uteruses https://imgur.com/lrwGAvv https://imgur.com/lrwGAvv are right around the corner (hello Matrix), and so men can then buy an egg from a woman egg donor, do an artificial insemination, and grow the child in the artificial womb. That way, a man can have a baby but not be in jeapordy of losing the child or any assets like they would if they get married and then divorced. For companionship, maybe with these new robots, that will bring new companionship to the next level.
- FrontierPsych 4y agoI didn't expect the response that I got. There is an article on how Korean women are sick and tired of men. I write basically that men should also do the same thing regarding women. And get hit with the "incel" word. I must admit, I honestly don't understand why it's ok for women to say that they want to live without men, but not the same for saying men not to live with women. Can someone explain this to me? I thought it was pretty fair and equal, didn't mean any offense. I sure wassn't meaning any horrible things by it. I thought it was very honest comment that I wrote.
- lostlogin 4y agoYou make it sound like divorce is an anti-male process. Why should the male get more of the assets? Why do courts usually decide to give mothers a larger role in caring for children? There may be sexism involved, but if so, it’s a rare example of women coming out ahead. You make it sound like women can’t do construction jobs. Have you heard or seen how women in those jobs are treated? Maybe the issue isn’t that women can’t do those jobs? You make the role of the married woman sound like it’s about pillows and mindless yabbering about people of little relevance. Perhaps they have roles in their relationships that are more complex and more important. When you pick a group that are disadvantaged by most measures (eg lower wages, worse job prospects, worse healthcare outcomes, more likely to be victims of abuse) and deride their concerns, it’s a gross. It’s pretty much the attitude the women in the article were trying to avoid.
- sillybov3456 4y agoThis is gross
- lostlogin 4y agoDo you want women about or not?
- sneakerblack 4y agoThis screams disgruntled incel to me
- tintedfireglass 4y agowoah woah, calm down bud.