We’ll because taking risks by definition means you could end up in a negative situation and so it should be more of a personal decision? It seems like SVB took

We’ll because taking risks by definition means you could end up in a negative situation and so it should be more of a personal decision? It seems like SVB took a risk and lost. If the majority of Americans voted for SVB taking higher risks it would be understandable but now who comes up with the missing money ? The government, which is tax payers who are already probably getting the raw end of the stick financially compare to silicon valleys. I think this bailout will see a lot of political backlash.