> You concluded that the article didn't need to be written That's my opinion, but we can legitimately disagree about that. I have no wish to argue it. My argu

> You concluded that the article didn't need to be written That's my opinion, but we can legitimately disagree about that. I have no wish to argue it. My argument with you was with your interpretation of the article: > The message I took from the writing wasn’t “like everything indiscriminately”, but closer to “stop making hating stuff a part of your identity”. You may have taken that message from the article, but you apparently already had that idea before you read the article. As far as I see, there's nothing in the article text that says anything like that. In any case, my original comment wasn't arguing with you but rather with someone else: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35122226 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35122226 You replied to me, but I don't think your reply was very relevant to mine.