> Emacs can feel worse, in this regard; but, I for one love how open it is to extend. Literally a defun and you've extended it. Which is how all (or at least m

> Emacs can feel worse, in this regard; but, I for one love how open it is to extend. Literally a defun and you've extended it. Which is how all (or at least most) of our computing systems should work. The inability to easily extend programs is what leads to the "need" to replace them so often with other programs that satisfy unmet needs or capabilities. Which ends up mostly creating churn, not value or utility.