4 ms·
Yes, it clearly isn't the same. In the first place, we are not talking about randomness. Your example is facile and your copy and paste sarcasm is both unwelcom
by Karunamon 4y ago
Yes, it clearly isn't the same. In the first place, we are not talking about randomness. Your example is facile and your copy and paste sarcasm is both unwelcome and against the rules. I'm done here.
- notch898a 4y agoI see so we're yet again moving the goalposts you set and now moving on to additional criteria like whether chance was involved. On the contrary, I would say quite a bit of uncertainty was involved, especially since a lowest uncertainty option was outlawed.