63 ms·

I'm amazed at this New York Times article from 1984 narrating about a "not-too-distant future" that is actually happening now: https://www.nytimes.com/1984/11/

I'm amazed at this New York Times article from 1984 narrating about a "not-too-distant future" that is actually happening now: https://www.nytimes.com/1984/11/04/magazine/photography-s-new-bag-of-tricks.html https://www.nytimes.com/1984/11/04/magazine/photography-s-ne... > In the not-too-distant future, realistic-looking images will probably have to be labeled, like words, as either fiction or nonfiction, because it may be impossible to tell them apart. We may have to rely on the image maker, and not the image, to tell us into which category certain pictures fall.

deleted 4y ago
[deleted]
themoonisachees 4y ago
Even before AI that was true. France has a law that mandates every photoshopped picture of people used in advertising to be labeled as doctored. They just put it in tiny text on the side, but every single French ad with a person on it does say "Photo Retouchée" (because of course they all are)
- m463 4y ago
  I wonder if that applies to (automatic) in-camera filters/effects nowadays.