5 ms·
There’s a saying: "Amateurs talk about tactics, but professionals study logistics." The problem as I see it isn’t the satellites specifically, they want to hav
by schneems 4y ago
There’s a saying: "Amateurs talk about tactics, but professionals study logistics."
The problem as I see it isn’t the satellites specifically, they want to have a firm of understanding of what can and cannot happen.
When you’re moving millions/billions of dollars of hardware, where mistakes cost lives, you bet I want to be sure I know what a CEO can and cannot decide on a whim. Especially this particular CEO with his many recent very public and very bad whims (across multiple companies, not just SpaceX).
- mlindner 4y agoThis is what contracts are for. There was no contract signed here.
- yumraj 4y ago> Especially this particular CEO … Not just whims, this particular CEO has massive business interests in China which will result in a major conflict of interest in a potential US-China direct or indirect conflict.
- mlindner 4y ago> Not just whims, this particular CEO has massive business interests in China which will result in a major conflict of interest in a potential US-China direct or indirect conflict. Most CEOs of most large companies have large business interests in China. If it's a concern for one it's a concern for all.
- 123pie123 4y agoI never realized that I wonder if Elon could sell SpaceX secrets / IP to China?
- wmf 4y agoThat sounds like an ITAR violation.
- ceejayoz 4y agoElon Musk, notably a stickler for following regulations.
- labster 4y agoSell to China, tweet about overbearing government regulators after the fact.
- Espressosaurus 4y agoYou do NOT fuck with ITAR. You are personally liable for any violations and it can result in jail time for you, personally. And the company is liable too. I would hope anybody in that chain of command knows that, and tells him to go fuck himself if he drops even the hint of exporting it.
- imglorp 4y agoNot only conflicts with the Chinese, but also their friends the Russians: Suggesting appeasement: https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1576969255031296000 https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1576969255031296000 Entertaining sanctioned presenter: https://www.businessinsider.com/musk-spotted-pro-putin-russian-tv-presenter-world-cup-2022-12?op=1 https://www.businessinsider.com/musk-spotted-pro-putin-russi... Tesla buys aluminum from Rusal: https://www.cnbc.com/2022/03/14/tesla-has-bought-aluminum-from-russian-supplier-rusal-since-2020.html https://www.cnbc.com/2022/03/14/tesla-has-bought-aluminum-fr... "Tesla, as the only 100% foreign-owned automaker in China, holds a privileged place, but it holds it tenuously. The risk that China could retaliate against Tesla in response to U.S. or European sanctions or policies China finds distasteful has always been present": https://seekingalpha.com/article/4501080-a-new-tesla-risk-russias-ukraine-invasion https://seekingalpha.com/article/4501080-a-new-tesla-risk-ru...
- mlindner 4y agoElon Musk was literally spit on by the Russians before starting SpaceX. There was also the long going spat with the former head of Roscosmos with him calling the Falcon 9 a "broomstick" and saying that NASA will need a trampoline to get to space and Elon Musk playing into those jokes. It's amazing how much people forget history and only remember recent events.
- imglorp 4y agoIt's not us who overlook those sleights, it is he snubbing Ukraine, buying from Russia, and seeking a Tesla factory there.
- _2z1p 4y agoSo do the Biden's... > CEFC China Energy, which has close ties to the Chinese Communist Party and People's Liberation Army, paid entities controlled by the then-cash-strapped Hunter Biden or his uncle James Biden $4.8 million over the course of 14 months beginning in 2017, according to The Washington Post. https://news.yahoo.com/hunter-biden-paid-millions-chinese-172615419.html https://news.yahoo.com/hunter-biden-paid-millions-chinese-17...
- Waterluvian 4y agoI’m often left nonplussed at how many people seem satisfied with a “Enh, that’s not what’s happening this moment and it probably won’t ever happen…” for all kinds of issues. That’s completely non-reassuring. But even worse: it’s very concerning when someone is reassured by it. Like logistics, individual events are not really interesting or meaningful. I want to understand the possibility space.