3 ms·
>if you demand that they pay $40/hr with full benefits >a job he may have been happy to have as a first job or for supplemental income You are contradicting y
by ssnistfajen 4y ago
>if you demand that they pay $40/hr with full benefits
>a job he may have been happy to have as a first job or for supplemental income
You are contradicting yourself here. Those two conditions don't occur at the same time.
- SoftTalker 4y agodid you overlook the "or" in my sentence?
- ssnistfajen 4y agoNo. Someone who's happy to have a first job OR as supplemental income is not going to demand $40/hr with full benefits in those sectors. You are using a completely hypothetical scenario to justify exploiting children.
- SoftTalker 4y agoOk I misread your conment. I was responding to those who seem to think that any job should be able to support a family, or should not be permitted to exist. Not supporting exploitation of children, dont know where that came from.