The proposal that "the juice isn't worth the squeeze" in this case is so disingenuous: the idea is that the division his presence is causing in the school may b

The proposal that "the juice isn't worth the squeeze" in this case is so disingenuous: the idea is that the division his presence is causing in the school may be an argument for not letting him speak at all. But that argument is offered by people who don't want him to be there in the first place. So, on the one hand they are protesting him, and on the other they're saying "gosh, is it even worth it if it's causing these protests?" In other words, they are using their own choices as evidence of a cause and effect relationship they lay at the feat of a third party.