It's good there's been a formal apology, however there's no clear corrective action outlined yet. It's simply unacceptable this kind of behavior was permitted t

It's good there's been a formal apology, however there's no clear corrective action outlined yet. It's simply unacceptable this kind of behavior was permitted toward an invited guest at one of the country's top law schools. The justice system that protects all of us is based on adversarial viewpoints being heard. If a student doesn't want to hear what a speaker has to say they shouldn't attend. Seizing the power to unilaterally censor a viewpoint by shouting it down is not only arrogant, it prevents any rational criticism. I may not agree with the speaker's viewpoint but how can I even understand it if we're prevented from hearing it explained in his own words.