3 ms·
Yeah, no, I agree with you. For other, less blatantly slipshod efforts, run by less blatant grifters, it might have been a faux pas to immediately point and lau
by branon 4y ago
Yeah, no, I agree with you. For other, less blatantly slipshod efforts, run by less blatant grifters, it might have been a faux pas to immediately point and laugh. Assume good-faith, and all that.
But for this? Cryptobros running bookkeeping over Google Docs and collaborating on their project via Discord? Crying to the FTC and FBI, the centralized arbiters their own model casts aside?
By all means, point and laugh. These people and their projects need crucified publicly. It's nothing personal. They were asking for it: this should be obvious, and it should be obvious why. If it's not, they need to find a new line of work.