2 ms·
My reading of that question was different. She was asking if the free speech juice was with the squeeze. She was proud of what the students were doing and was n
by gnicholas 4y ago
My reading of that question was different. She was asking if the free speech juice was with the squeeze. She was proud of what the students were doing and was not questioning them or their actions at all.
- Pigalowda 4y agoWe have the same reading, I was answering for Duncan rather than the students. It wasn’t worth his effort to continue imo. These are future lawyers - they should have come armed with facts and performed an eloquent take down if they disagreed. Instead it’s just childish, disruptive, and completely unprofessional whining condoned by the administrator.
- starkd 4y agoI think he continued precisely because he sees them as future lawyers. If you cannot engage people with such aspirations, we are doomed as a society.
- TedDoesntTalk 4y agoContinued use of the word “safe” and “safety” was strange. What about his appearance was unsafe? Can’t you leave the room if you feel unsafe?
- slowmovintarget 4y agoShe should know the answer to that. Free speech is the price of a free society. It also means you have to be ready to offer a defense of what you believe with more speech. This goes doubly so for lawyers whose tools are words. That we're cultivating a generation of people ruled by their emotions rather than their reason is a cause for great concern.