4 ms·

In that case, we would perhaps still be a millennia from the technology required to get there. Imagine the fuel required to get to Mars with air resistance! The

by zxexz 4y ago

In that case, we would perhaps still be a millennia from the technology required to get there. Imagine the fuel required to get to Mars with air resistance! The materials that would be required to keep the plane from being destroyed by the heat and vibrations from the speed for such a duration! The heat dissipation required would presumably be immense with that constant acceleration due to air resistance. I think we can be glad that space is a hostile vacuum.

andrewflnr 4y ago
OTOH, sailing might be possible. Odds are against the atmosphere being perfectly still, certainly.
- snek_case 4y ago
  It would just take too long. Modern space capsules travel at kilometers per second, and it would still take months to reach Mars. If were to travel there a 30km/h it would take centuries to get there. ... This is all ignoring the fact that orbital mechanics just wouldn't work if there was air resistance. The planets would quickly slow down and crash into the sun.
  - andrewflnr 4y ago
    Right, of course the real answer is that none of this is possible, at least not just replacing the interplanetary atmosphere without adjusting anything else for consistency. But imagine this: a breathable nitrox atmosphere co-orbiting with the planets. Each planet is roughly at rest with respect to the local atmosphere, so no drag. Just lots and lots of wind shear. Probably planetary scale vortices. That'll sap orbital energy into heat, so probably not stable, but pilots can probably exploit it to acheive velocities comparable to orbital velocities over time. I think you'd probably have to have two sails connected by a tether, sufficiently far that their air streams are at significantly different speed, with one of them acting like a keel.
- hinkley 4y ago
  That Mark Twain story about the flying boat comes to mind.
numpad0 4y ago
Can’t we just fly a U-2 all the way up and out of Earth SOI, then drift towards Mars in that situation? Do we still need to establish an orbit?
- Jeff_Brown 4y ago
  If the air had no currents, the steady state would be motionlessness except gravity effects. If it had currents, the steady state would be to follow them. Of course those gravity effects would also apply to the air, which makes the scenario inconsistent. I'd be interested to see a formulation of the laws of physics that actually makes a substantial interplanetary atmosphere possible.
hinkley 4y ago
You’d have to have different physics. If the earth were revolving in an atmosphere and air resistance was a thing, we’d have spiraled into the sun by the Cretaceous.

by zxexz 4y ago

andrewflnr 4y ago

OTOH, sailing might be possible. Odds are against the atmosphere being perfectly still, certainly.

snek_case 4y ago
It would just take too long. Modern space capsules travel at kilometers per second, and it would still take months to reach Mars. If were to travel there a 30km/h it would take centuries to get there. ... This is all ignoring the fact that orbital mechanics just wouldn't work if there was air resistance. The planets would quickly slow down and crash into the sun.
- andrewflnr 4y ago
  Right, of course the real answer is that none of this is possible, at least not just replacing the interplanetary atmosphere without adjusting anything else for consistency. But imagine this: a breathable nitrox atmosphere co-orbiting with the planets. Each planet is roughly at rest with respect to the local atmosphere, so no drag. Just lots and lots of wind shear. Probably planetary scale vortices. That'll sap orbital energy into heat, so probably not stable, but pilots can probably exploit it to acheive velocities comparable to orbital velocities over time. I think you'd probably have to have two sails connected by a tether, sufficiently far that their air streams are at significantly different speed, with one of them acting like a keel.
hinkley 4y ago
That Mark Twain story about the flying boat comes to mind.

numpad0 4y ago

Can’t we just fly a U-2 all the way up and out of Earth SOI, then drift towards Mars in that situation? Do we still need to establish an orbit?

Jeff_Brown 4y ago
If the air had no currents, the steady state would be motionlessness except gravity effects. If it had currents, the steady state would be to follow them. Of course those gravity effects would also apply to the air, which makes the scenario inconsistent. I'd be interested to see a formulation of the laws of physics that actually makes a substantial interplanetary atmosphere possible.

hinkley 4y ago

You’d have to have different physics. If the earth were revolving in an atmosphere and air resistance was a thing, we’d have spiraled into the sun by the Cretaceous.