I did not see a problem with Hinton's argument here - perhaps you would care to expand? If we are evaluating LLM's purely on outcome alone, it seems only fair

I did not see a problem with Hinton's argument here - perhaps you would care to expand? If we are evaluating LLM's purely on outcome alone, it seems only fair to compare them to humans that don't have fully functioning cognitive capabilities. We wouldn't discredit a schizophrenic person that hallucinates, we know that this person can also see reality for what it is, most of the time. I just don't think that finding absurd examples, usually after careful prompting, is a slam dunk against LLM's at all.