3 ms·
I declare his wider point isn't very useful to the discourse at large. Most everyone acknowledges and agrees on the fact that LLMs are stochastic parrots. That
by emptysongglass 4y ago
I declare his wider point isn't very useful to the discourse at large. Most everyone acknowledges and agrees on the fact that LLMs are stochastic parrots. That doesn't diminish their utility. Chomsky is trying to make himself sound sagacious in a sea of hype but he isn't adding anything new to the conversation and even the title, "The False Promise of ChatGPT" (emphasis mine) attacks a contingent of believers that simply don't exist or are a minority. ChatGPT isn't promising to be anything other than useful. It fulfills that promise.
- masswerk 4y agoI think, Chomsky's point is that certainty and negativity are two related concepts presupposing each other, forming the very basis of conceptuality as we know it (or, maybe better: how it is relevant for us). Stochastic probability is neither of this, nor does it promise to lead towards this.