Can't it be that you are fooled by his eloquence and gentlemanliness, but the actual substance is weak? Or that you cut him more slack because you want him to b

Can't it be that you are fooled by his eloquence and gentlemanliness, but the actual substance is weak? Or that you cut him more slack because you want him to be right? Chomsky used some examples in his article of what LLM's would get wrong. It is clear that he hasn't even tried, because chatGPT in fact gets those examples right. Why does he get a free pass for such errors? Sounds like Aristotle when he claimed that women do not have wisdom teeth for reasons (he made up), instead of bothering to check.