3 ms·
is it a correct understanding that svb actually has troves of money, but it's locked down in bonds noone wants because of their low return value ( yet unless th
by bsaul 4y ago
is it a correct understanding that svb actually has troves of money, but it's locked down in bonds noone wants because of their low return value ( yet unless the US treasury bankrupts, they will never default) ?
It seems like a very specific situation quite far from 2008...
why isn't the banling sector simply lending the cash for daily operations, while SVB sorts the situation ?
It's much better than loosing everything in a systemic crash.