Just to be clear, I think the stance of my original comment was clear enough, and the original reply to me was a bit underhanded. Both it and your comment are p

Just to be clear, I think the stance of my original comment was clear enough, and the original reply to me was a bit underhanded. Both it and your comment are poking for something, but I'm not sure what that is or what argument I'm setting up for that wasn't already in my original comment. If you have any substantiative commentary, that would be welcomed.