It seems like the point of that comment to look knowledgeable while providing no actionable information[2] and falsely implying it’s too difficult[1], so I’m gu

It seems like the point of that comment to look knowledgeable while providing no actionable information[2] and falsely implying it’s too difficult[1], so I’m guessing no, as that would defeat their seeming objectives in making the comment to begin with. [1] which it isn’t; here’s what legit attempts at explanation look like: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35113400 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35113400 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35113126 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35113126 [2] if it weren’t, it would explained some of the terminology used, since the asker clearly isn’t deep in the business in the first place