that's great, thanks for sharing! (though I'm not enough of a domain expert to know if it's accurate) another solution to this would be if Science Advances wer

that's great, thanks for sharing! (though I'm not enough of a domain expert to know if it's accurate) another solution to this would be if Science Advances were to require submissions to provide a "Significance Statement", like PNAS does, which would be essentially at the level of readability you provided.